Injurytalk.com - Brought to you by Parker Waichman Alonso Mark, LLP

You are not logged in.

Forum


On September 15, 1997 the FDA asked American Home Products (now Wyeth), the manufacturer or fenfluramine (Pondimin) and dexfenfluramine (Redux) to voluntarily remove these drugs from the market. These anti-obesity drugs were prescribed by themselves or in combination with phentermine for weight loss. "Fen-Phen" refers to the use in combination of fenfluramine and phentermine.

The FDA decision to remove the drugs came after researchers at the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation reported 24 cases of rare valvular disease know as Primary Pulmonary Hypertension or PPH in women who took the "fen-phen" combination therapy. Subsequently, FDA received 66 additional reports of heart valve disease associated mainly with "fen-phen." There were also reports of cases seen in patients taking only fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine.

Primary Pulmonary Hypertension can take years to develop. If you or a loved on took Fen Phen and was diagnosed with PPH you may have valuable legal rights, please complete the case inquiry form of the right side of this page for a free consultation.

#26 2008-05-19 06:00:48

mthore43
Member
Registered: 2007-05-21
Posts: 121

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

> Pecky wrote:

> I NEVER signed a power of attorney before getting my money. I was sent a "contract" to sing in exchange for the settlement amount offered on the grid. I accepted and was sent a check in the correct amount.

If your Lawyer sent you a check from his account and you didn't sign this last check in person that was sent to him and made out to both of you then you either signed a POA at some point or the Law firm fraudulently signed your name which I'd bet they didn't do.

They couldn't have cashed the check any other way.

Thore

Offline

 

#27 2008-05-19 23:46:44

Pecky
Member
Registered: 2003-04-29
Posts: 236

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

The check I got wasn't from the lawyer's account but straight from the settlement minus the lawyers fees.

Offline

 

#28 2008-05-20 06:34:14

Elsie
Member
Registered: 2007-01-30
Posts: 70

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

lsdlden, and everyone... My lawyer emailed me yesterday and I drove to his office and picked up my check for the correct amount so all is well. Thank you everyone and good health and happiness.

Offline

 

#29 2008-05-20 06:44:37

mthore43
Member
Registered: 2007-05-21
Posts: 121

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

> Pecky wrote:

> The check I got wasn't from the lawyer's account but straight from the settlement minus the lawyers fees.

Good for you, not sure I follow how all that worked then, were you not part of the 7th?

I wasn't aware of the trust splitting up funds and paying lawyers directly.

Thore

Offline

 

#30 2008-05-20 06:58:27

clocklady
Member
Registered: 2008-05-16
Posts: 4

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

mthore43 - I'm wondering the same.  I didn't sign a POA and they are telling me to expect my may part within the next two weeks.  I wondering the same thing.  How could they have deposited it if I didn't endorse it.  It's also funny, that when ever I call he's never in the office.  I'm smell somthing fishy.

Offline

 

#31 2008-05-20 07:50:53

mthore43
Member
Registered: 2007-05-21
Posts: 121

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

I received a breakdown of all funds and a request to sign the POA which has been done once they adjusted the fee structure to match the PTO,

If it walks like a duck & talks like a duck, its a duck.

Thore

Last edited by mthore43 (2008-05-20 08:27:31)

Offline

 

#32 2008-05-20 22:13:01

Pecky
Member
Registered: 2003-04-29
Posts: 236

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

We are talking 5 years ago, when I received my payment.
Also my lawyers were CC lawyers.
> mthore43 wrote:

> > Pecky wrote:

> The check I got wasn't from the lawyer's account but straight from the settlement minus the lawyers fees.

Good for you, not sure I follow how all that worked then, were you not part of the 7th?

I wasn't aware of the trust splitting up funds and paying lawyers directly.

Thore

Offline

 

#33 2008-05-21 07:57:39

mthore43
Member
Registered: 2007-05-21
Posts: 121

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

Pecky

That all make since then although it really isn't relevant to the latest action of the 7th.

Offline

 

#34 2008-05-21 23:37:03

malikee
Member
Registered: 2006-08-15
Posts: 436

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

Maybe that was one of the lawyers that were called up for contempt of court for charging to much and the fund sent seperate checks.

Offline

 

#35 2008-05-22 03:23:28

Marie
Member
Registered: 2003-02-21
Posts: 2424

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

Unlike the 7th, compensation checks paid from the original trust had ALL fees and expenses, for both claimant and any derivative, deducted from it before the checks were sent from the trust. I don't know with absolute certainty because I recieved mine as a pro se, but I suspect the trust sent at least two separate checks when they paid on a claim. One made out to the attorney for fees and expenses, and the other made out to the claimant for the balance. If there was a derivative claimant involved, then a third check would have been sent for that person(s). Obviously, there would be no need for a POA with this arrangement and the check could be sent directly to the claimant.

The 7th did it differently. The only thing the 7th withheld from the total compensation was the common benefit fee on the final distribution. So the entire balance consisting of the attorneys fees and costs, and both the derivative and claimant shares all got sent out in a single check made out to both the claimant and the attorney. In contrast to the way it was done from the original trust which already divided up the money before it was sent out, the sole responsibility for dividing up 7th distributions properly was left up to the attorney. In this situation a POA is necessary since the check is made out in two names and this delays the payment to the claimant for a period of time.

Offline

 

#36 2008-05-23 15:04:59

ypz
Member
Registered: 2007-02-12
Posts: 22

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

Has any of your lawyers said they didn't receive the checks on time. I was supposed to get my today after it was held for 10 days instead I got an email saying that they didn't receive my check until the 15th and it wouldn't be sent till next week.

Offline

 

#37 2008-05-23 16:22:20

Marie
Member
Registered: 2003-02-21
Posts: 2424

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

YPZ,
Maybe what they've told you is true, but it sure sounds like a crock of crap to me!  The checks were mailed to the attorneys on 5/8 and 5/9 by UPS overnight delivery. Unless your attorney has his office in some remote corner of the amazon jungle,  it surely wouldn't have taken UPS until 5/15 to get it delivered.

Offline

 

#38 2008-05-23 17:00:11

ypz
Member
Registered: 2007-02-12
Posts: 22

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

Thats what I thought ! I recieved my letter and copy on the 15th.  They are a large firm out of Texas. I'm so angry about it but don't know what I can do about it. I signed up with a local attorney who that went in with this Texas firm. I feel so ripped off. When I even signed up so many years ago they made it sound like I needed them to fight for me and at least earn their 40%, when after the fact I find out I didn't need them at all, with the class action everything was done I wish I would have found this site way back when before I was so stupid about how everything worked. Now they hold my money hostage for another week. I asked them if they were holding it to milk some more intrest off it and they told me that any intrest made off it had to be turned over to something else that they don't get to benefit from it. Wish I knew if this was true. I'll be so happy to be done with all this, I'm so tired of it all.

Offline

 

#39 2008-05-26 14:32:19

Harold Cave
Member
Registered: 2007-09-15
Posts: 29

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

ypz---notify CC of this . If they told youin writing fax that to themm No lawywer will wpeak to us. Only an accountant

Offline

 

#40 2008-05-28 02:04:03

malikee
Member
Registered: 2006-08-15
Posts: 436

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

google the law firm and see if you can get an email address then you will have something in writing that they are not reponsive.

Offline

 

#41 2008-05-28 02:05:15

malikee
Member
Registered: 2006-08-15
Posts: 436

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

my friends lawyer held her money for several months and promised every week to send it.  it was a cash settlement a long time ago.  She finally went in to his office and demanded the money and they wrote her a check.

Last edited by malikee (2008-05-28 02:06:04)

Offline

 

#42 2008-05-28 06:21:27

Harold Cave
Member
Registered: 2007-09-15
Posts: 29

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

I did e-mail our law firm. It was in a contact us box and I did not have their e-mail address but it did give me an opportunity to copy myself , so I have a date stamped copy of the e-mail.

Offline

 

#43 2008-05-28 11:25:35

mthore43
Member
Registered: 2007-05-21
Posts: 121

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

Harold

I'm wondering did you already sign the POA?

Offline

 

#44 2008-05-28 12:55:03

Harold Cave
Member
Registered: 2007-09-15
Posts: 29

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

No , of course not. i do not have our money and they do not have theirs. Were you in teh 7th and did you get treated ok?

Offline

 

#45 2008-05-28 13:02:22

mthore43
Member
Registered: 2007-05-21
Posts: 121

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

If you read the beginnings of the thread you'll get my story,

Offline

 

#46 2008-05-28 13:19:51

Harold Cave
Member
Registered: 2007-09-15
Posts: 29

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

Ok I read it . You are lucky . You have a less dishoonest lawyer, who spilled the beans when called on his "mistake". My firm has nine other grid clients who average around 300k settlements . That would be a lot of money. I'll bet not more than 4 even read or know about this board. Because of our efforts, our law firm is being required to disclose their final statmnets to the entity , associated with the 7th , that we contacted. So, they should be ok. Then there is the issue of the "adninstartive fees" . But with your "corrected" payout and teh other five or six stories of similiar "computer errors" i can not  help but think that there may be many many others that will or have been victims of "Honest mstakes". Get It?

Offline

 

#47 2008-05-29 12:57:19

mthore43
Member
Registered: 2007-05-21
Posts: 121

Re: READ CAREFULLY-

Maybe, although I haven't seen any cash is hand yet, we'll see what happens next.

Offline

 

Board footer

Case Evaluation

© 2002-2007 YourLawyer.com. All Rights Reserved.
Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.